Monday, 13 January 2014

Austrian Science Fund funding the metamorphosis of HSS open access journals

In 2012 the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research made funding available to help launch brand new open access journals in the humanities and social sciences (HSS), or to convert existing journals from the traditional subscription model to open access. Media owners in Austria were invited to submit expressions of interest. 36 expressions of interest were received, 19 were invited to submit a full proposal, and eight have now been approved.

Not only does FWF, Austria's central funding organisation for basic research, have one of the most comprehensive open access policies around, but it is backed up with programmes like this one to help the transformation. Aside from being a Europe PMC Funder (of course), they also helped set up Open Access Network Austria in 2013 to coordinate open access policies and activities of Austrian research institutions and funding organisations, and created a repository for research outputs which take the form of books,

 Image credit: SidPix, Flickr
For this particular programme, a stringent review process was needed to whittle down the 36 expressions of interest to the final selection which will receive initial funding of up to €50,000 or €100,000. The reviews focused on things like quality assurance, the logistics of open access and innovation. Falk Reckling, FWF’s Head of Strategic Analysis said:

The FWF regards that programme as a success. However, a programme like this run by a single country has just a minor effect on the publication system as such. Therefore, science funders (at least on the European level) should launch similar programmes on the international level together, especially by funding the transition of some outstanding subscription journals from all disciplinary fields. Otherwise, as the former FWF President Christoph Kratky recently stated in NATURE, the open access movement  is in danger of losing momentum: "Even the most optimistic advocates of open access to academic publications must admit that we are years — and perhaps decades — away from full conversion to such a system. It is easy to call for open access, but more difficult to make it happen. More science funders must put their money where their mouths are, and back their positive words with action. It will not be cheap, but the longer we wait, the more expensive it will be."

Further details of the review process and a list of the selected journals can be found in the FWF report.

Tuesday, 7 January 2014

Choose which part of an article you want to search...

With our newly released feature, you can decide to search just the methods section, just the results section, just the acknowledgements section, or a combination of 16 article section categories that have been identified in full text articles in Europe PMC.

Perhaps you've contributed to a paper by providing reagents, or technical expertise, to enable someone else's experiments. You might want to keep track of acknowledgement of your support. Now you can: the Acknowledgements and Funding, Materials and Methods, and Supplementary Data sections are probably relevant here.
Source: Shutterstock Copyright: teeranop

What about that great diagram you saw a few months ago, which would be really useful in a lecture you're preparing? You can use section-level searching to specifically search article figures. Of course, when you find it, you should check with the author or publisher that it's ok to use the diagram, and properly attribute it, but it is now easier to find.

This last example requires a little more time to construct the search (though it's straightforward to do from the Advanced search page):

Imagine you do research into Alzheimer's disease, for example. A paper has been published by someone who does research into another form of tauopathy, for example frontotemporal dementia. Because frontotemporal dementia is their particular research focus, the abstract will concentrate on the importance of their findings in this area, but they may well have relevance to your research too, and the researcher will very likely discuss the wider implications of their research in their discussion, perhaps mentioning Alzheimer's disease here. With section-level searching, you can identify these articles much more easily by confining your search to the Discussion sections of our full text articles:

(DISCUSS:"Alzheimer*" NOT ABBR:"Alzheimer*" NOT ACK_FUND:"Alzheimer*" NOT APPENDIX:"Alzheimer*" NOT AUTH_CON:"Alzheimer*" NOT CASE:"Alzheimer*" NOT COMP_INT:"Alzheimer*" NOT CONCL:"Alzheimer*" NOT FIG:"Alzheimer*" NOT INTRO:"Alzheimer*" NOT KEYWORD:"Alzheimer*" NOT METHODS:"Alzheimer*" NOT OTHER:"Alzheimer*" NOT REF:"Alzheimer*" NOT RESULTS:"Alzheimer*" NOT SUPPL:"Alzheimer*" NOT TABLE:"Alzheimer*")

I think this last example could unearth some information nuggets that are not otherwise easy to find. It would be good to know if it yields any articles of interest if you try it!

Source: Shutterstock Copyright: Andrey_Kuzmin

We'd love to hear how else you might use this new refined method for searching. Let us know how you get on - as always we're happy to receive feedback so that we can make improvements.

To stay up-to-date with Europe PMC news you can also follow us on Twitter @EuropePMC_news